Posted on January 25, 2010 by bkingr
here is a message from John Piper about why he finds the Glory of God to be the central point of the Bible and all creation.
fascinating stuff. the intro:
How does the Bible orient us around the glory of God?
I’m just overwhelmed, and have been for 40 years, with the centrality in the Bible of the glory of God.
It is presented to us pervasively as the goal of all existence.
So it should be pervasive, right down to whether I just took that last swig of water for the glory of God. And here’s another one. [Drinks another sip of water.] So thank you, Father, for this. Please sustain my throat.
It’s amazing how pervasive in the Bible is the language of the glory of God.
Filed under: teaching | Tagged: bible, centrality of God's glory, glory of God, John Piper | Leave a comment »
Posted on January 19, 2010 by bkingr
Posted on January 6, 2010 by bkingr
Austin Stone Community Church has just had the first week of a short series on the importance of reading the Bible.
I saw somewhere the other day that a slight majority of professing believers doesn’t even have biblical literacy as a goal. Obviously, those folks do not really believe that all scripture has been breathed out by God and is useful … so that we can be complete and thoroughly equipped for every good work.
yesterday I ran across this fantastic article from David Nienhuis on the problem of evangelical Biblical illiteracy.
here is how he defines Biblical Literacy:
What is biblical literacy? Coming to an agreed-upon definition is itself part of the problem. I think all would agree that, at base, it involves a more detailed understanding of the Bible’s actual content. This requires: (1) schooling in the substance of the entire biblical story in all its literary diversity (not just an assortment of those verses deemed doctrinally relevant); (2) training in the particular “orienteering” skills required to plot that narrative through the actual texts and canonical units of the Bible; and (3) instruction in the complex theological task of interpreting Scripture in light of the tradition of the church and the experience of the saints.
here is his set up of the problem. Go read the rest for more details.
These numbers serve to underscore the now widespread recognition that the Bible continues to hold pride of place as “America’s favorite unopened text” (to borrow David Gibson’s wonderful phrase), even among many Christians. As a professor of New Testament studies at Seattle Pacific University, I know this reality only too well. I often begin my survey of the Christian Scriptures course by asking students to take a short biblical literacy quiz, including questions of the sort mentioned above. The vast majority of my students–around 95 percent of them–are Christians, and half of them typically report that they currently attend nondenominational evangelical churches. Yet the class as a whole consistently averages a score of just over 50 percent, a failing grade. In the most recent survey, only half were able to identify which biblical book begins with the line, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” Barely more than half knew where to turn in the Bible to read about the first Passover. Most revealing in my mind is the fact that my students are generally unable to sequence major stories and events from the biblical metanarrative. Only 23 percent were able to order four key events from Israel’s history (Israelites enter the promised land; David is made king; Israel is divided in two; and the people of Judah go into exile), and only 32 percent were able to sequence four similarly important events from the New Testament (Jesus was baptized; Peter denies Jesus; the Spirit descends at Pentecost; and John has a vision on the island of Patmos). These students may know isolated Bible trivia (84 percent knew, for instance, that Jesus was born in Bethlehem), but their struggle to locate key stories, and their general inability to place those stories in the Bible’s larger plotline, betrays a serious lack of intimacy with the text–even though a full 86 percent of them identified the Bible as their primary source for knowledge about God and faith.
Filed under: bible | Tagged: bible, biblical illiteracy, biblical literacy, reading the bible | Leave a comment »
Posted on January 4, 2010 by bkingr
Paul T. McCain posted this from Ernest Koenker about why reading the Bible is a worthy goal for the new year.
The Bible is not simply an historical account or a literary masterpiece; it is the witness to Jesus Christ as the Son of God, and it presents the Deus loquens, the God who uses the Bible to speak to us today. God Himself works through the means of His grace today just as He worked through the prophetic and apostolic preaching. Today again the good news is proclaimed by a preacher standing in obedience to the Word, and it is heard by a congregation that is also dependent on this Word.— Ernest Koenker, Worship in Word and Sacrament,p. 25.
One thing that becomes crashingly clear when reading the Bible through like a novel is that its unifying theme is God’s passionate pursuit of people. His Word is the window into His nature and character.
Filed under: bible | Tagged: bible, biblical literacy, God's word, reading the bible | Leave a comment »
Posted on September 8, 2009 by bkingr
Here from Justin Taylor is another reminder of the importance of an essentially literal approach to Bible translation. Quoting Robert Alter:
My notion of effective translation of the Bible involves a high degree of literalism–within the limits of reasonably acceptable literary English–both in regard to representing the word choice and the word order of the Hebrew. . . . [T]he precedent of the King James Version has played a decisive and constructive role in directing readers of English to a rather literal experience of the Bible, and . . . this precedence can be ignored only at considerable cost, as nearly all the English versions of the Bible done in recent decades show.
Filed under: bible | Tagged: bible, bible translation, justin taylor, robert alter, translation, translation philosophy | Leave a comment »
Posted on September 6, 2009 by bkingr
iMonk quotes Scot McKnight’s breakdown of which evangelical tribes prefer which translation of the Bible. Interesting stuff. I don’t know if he meant for it to be amusing, but it kind of is that too.
Scott Mcknight recently came right out and said it: We do translations by tribes:
“NRSV for liberals and Shane Claiborne lovers;
ESV for Reformed complementarian Baptists;
HCSB for LifeWay store buying Southern Baptists;
NIV for complementarian evangelicals;
TNIV for egalitarians;
NASB for those who want straight Bible, forget the English;
NLT for generic brand evangelicals;
Amplified for folks who have no idea what translation is but know that if you try enough words one of them will hit pay dirt;
NKJV and KJV for Byzantine manuscript-tree huggers;
The Message for evangelicals looking for a breath of fresh air and seeker sensitive, never-read-a-commentary evangelists who find Peterson’s prose so catchy.”
I like and use the ESV mainly, but very much like and use the NIV and the HCSB as well.
Never have liked or used the NASB very much. I tried to, but it only gets looked at on hard verses where I want another perspective on the text.
neutral on KJV and NKJV. grew up with them, have verses memorized in KJV and enjoy quoting it, but really don’t use it much.
I actively dislike the NLT, the TNIV and the Message.
Filed under: bible | Tagged: bible, bible translations, evangelicals, translations, tribalism | 1 Comment »
Posted on August 19, 2009 by bkingr
Challies has reviewed The Death Penalty on Trial by Ron Gleason.
It sounds like a interesting and useful book for Christians who have trouble with the Death Penalty as a possible punishment by the State.
Go read the whole review and see what you think. I thought this part was a particularly interesting bit of perspective:
A theme that runs throughout the book is this: all murder is killing but not all killing is murder. Thus a person who murders another can be justly executed by the governing authorities without multiplying the evil. To kill a murderer is not to commit another murder. Rather, terrible though it is to have to take a life, it is an act of justice and a fitting penalty for one who would destroy a person made in God’s image.
Filed under: books | Tagged: bible, Biblical view of the Death Penalty, challies, death penalty, Death Penalty on Trial, Ron Gleason | Leave a comment »